|
Is the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional?
Last week's ruling by a California federal judge concluding that the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion has re-ignited a firestorm that burned across the country three years ago. The judge, Lawrence Karlton, explained that he was bound by a 2002 U.S. Ninth Circuit Court ruling that forbid the recitation of the pledge, even if not compulsory, on the grounds that it "impermissibly coerces a religious act" and "places students in the untenable position of choosing between participating in an exercise with religious content, or protesting." The day after the decision, the U.S. Justice Department announced that it would appeal to the Supreme Court. If the high court accepts the case, John Roberts, whose confirmation hearings as Chief Justice continue this week, may well be in place to help decide the issue. Front Page Talking Points is written by
Alan Stamm for NIEonline.com, Copyright 2013
We welcome comments or suggestions for future topics: Click here to Comment Front Page Talking Points Archive►Federal safety board urges tougher drinking-and-driving cutoff limit to match other nations ►Northeast braces for noisy invasion: Flying cicada bugs return after hiding for 17 years ►U.S. military prison at Guantanamo, Cuba, remains a tricky problem for President Obama ►Doctors warn about serious health risks from 'The Cinnamon Challenge' video craze ►Earth Day on April 22 focuses attention on how we can protect the natural environment ►Thousands of past players take on the National Football League over brain injuries ►North Korean missile threats create concern and U.S. show of military force ►South Africa reflects on the huge legacy of Nelson Mandela, hospitalized at 94 ►They come from space: NASA seeks money to spot and deflect risks from large asteroids ►This 'March Madness' basketball tournament season is special – the 75th in history |