|
Some environment 'news' can pollute your brain 
 Now that you read with a more critical eye, try to spot buzzword clichés or questionable statements in environmental coverage.
Our planet's big environmental issues are deeper and more detailed than newspaper, magazine or TV reports typically can address in a meaningful way. But that doesn't stop reporters and editors from typing - and from possibly confusing or misleading news consumers. Even some insiders are concerned about "whiplash journalism," as New York Times environment reporter Andrew Revkin recently described the back-and-forth volleys of optimistic news and dire warnings. A media journal published by Columbia University quotes Revkin as criticizing this cycle of "new hope" and "no hope" stories - such as reports that we'll see more hurricanes because of global warming, followed by studies saying we won't. A related problem, according to critics of quick-hit environmental journalism, is the popularity of buzzwords like "inconvenient truth," "green," "clean coal" and "tipping point." Overuse, including by companies that embrace "green" for image polishing, can make readers cynical and numb to actual news, Columbia Journalism Review suggested this summer. Its article is headlined "Five Inconvenient Truths of Environmental Journalism."
Front Page Talking Points is written by Felix Grabowski and Alan Stamm for NIEonline.com, Copyright 2008
We welcome comments or suggestions for future topics: Click here to Comment |
Front Page Archive Some environment 'news' can pollute your brain On your mark, get set . . . for the Summer Olympics Gulp 'n go light breakfast may backfire with weight gain Look where some teens get alcoholic drinks Mars discovery brings out of this world excitement Click to play: Online videos attract viewers of all ages Summer fun goal: Fewer trips to gas pump Bloggers may get a health boost, researchers say Is there a learning gap between boys and girls in school? Do we need government 'baby-sitters' for health? New game draws familiar fire: Grand Theft Auto series targeted again World Press Freedom Day spotlights an essential right Earth Day brings reminders of environmental gains and challenges Scrabble F-U-N turns into F-I-G-H-T over Facebook version British magazines draw flak over 'enhanced' photos that give models 'perfect' bodies Cyber censors block web news and videos in some nations Lights will go dark during Earth Hour this Saturday Online gender gap separates girls (No. 1) from boys in three areas For many music fans, CDs are so last century |
Length limits can lead reporters to oversimplify complex issues or omit clear explanations of scientific topics. Do you have unanswered questions after reading a selected article on the environment or another technical subject?
Balance is important in all news coverage. See if you sense a tilt toward one side in an article about an environmental risk, cleanup or trend.
Reporter says: "The never-ending search by some editors and reporters for 'bad guys' or villains to explain environmental problems is simplistic." -- Tim Wheeler of The Baltimore Sun, president of the Society of Environmental Journalists